Product Recall

Garia Recalls Golf & Courtesy Electric Vehicles


This entry was posted by on .

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On May 14, 2020, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:

Garia Recalls Golf & Courtesy Electric Vehicles Due to Fire Hazard.

According to the CPSC, “[a] fuse can overheat and melt while the electric vehicle is charging, posing a fire hazard.”

This entry was posted in CPSC Recalls, Products Liability and tagged .
Recall Alert

Fully Popped Recalls Poppin’ Cobs 10 Pack Microwave Popcorn


This entry was posted by on .

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On March 7, 2020, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:

Fully Popped Recalls Poppin’ Cobs 10 Pack Microwave Popcorn Due to Fire and Burn Hazards; Sold Exclusively at Uncommon Good Stores.

According to the CPSC, “[t]he popcorn’s paper bag can catch fire in the microwave, posing fire and burn hazards.”

This entry was posted in CPSC Recalls, Products Liability and tagged .
Community

New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Proof of Diminution of Market Value to Establish Damages


This entry was posted by on .

In Kornbleuth v. Westover, 2020 N.J. LEXIS 298, the Supreme Court of New Jersey considered whether the trail court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ trespass claim against their neighbors for failing to offer evidence of diminution of the market value of their property. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal, finding that the plaintiffs’ damages could not be determined, as a matter of law, because they did not offer evidence of the diminution of market value of their property as a result of the trespass. Although the plaintiffs presented evidence of the cost to restore the property, the court held that determining the applicable measure of damages for a trespass claim is dependent on the diminution of market value and whether or not the restoration costs are proportionate to that value. Continue reading →

This entry was posted in Damages - Real Property, Litigation, New Jersey and tagged , , .
Product Recall

Epson Recalls Power Adapters Sold With Epson Scanners


This entry was posted by on .

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On May 1, 2020, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:

Epson Recalls Power Adapters Sold with Epson Scanners Due to Burn and Fire Hazards.

According to the CPSC, “[t]he power adapters can overheat, melt and catch fire, posing burn and fire hazards.”

This entry was posted in CPSC Recalls, Products Liability and tagged .
Construction Defect

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose


This entry was posted by on .

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion” controlled the trigger date for California’s construction-related statute of repose, Cal. Civ. Code § 941(a). The Fourth District held that the agreement between the condominium owner and developer for Smart Corner Condominiums and the general contractor, Hensel Phelps Construction Co. (Hensel Phelps) – which determined the date of “substantial completion” for the construction project – did not control when the statute of repose started to run. Continue reading →

This entry was posted in California, Construction Defects, Statute of Limitations-Repose and tagged , , .
Recall Alert

Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls


This entry was posted by on .

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On April 16, 2020, the CPSC announced the following recalls related to products that present fire hazards:

  1. Polaris Recalls Model Year 2018 to 2020 Ranger XP 1000 Off-Road Vehicles. According to the CPSC, “[th]e clutch belt can break and damage the secondary clutch and the fuel line, posing a fire hazard to the rider.”
  2. Polaris Recalls Model Year 2019 to 2020 Ranger XP 1000 Off-Road Vehicles. According to the CPSC, “[t]he fuel line can be misrouted above the bracket that protects the fuel line from a clutch belt failure, posing a fire hazard to consumers.”
This entry was posted in CPSC Recalls, Products Liability and tagged .
Fire

Mississippi Supreme Court Applies AIA Subrogation Waiver to Non-Work Property Damage


This entry was posted by on .

In Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Fowlkes Plumbing., L.L.C., No. 2019-FC-10285-SCT, 2020 Miss. LEXIS 44, the Supreme Court of Mississippi considered whether the subrogation waiver in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract, American Institute of Architects (AIA) form A201-2007, applied to claims for damages to property unrelated to the construction work. Siding with the majority of jurisdictions that have addressed this issue, the court interpreted the AIA subrogation waiver to apply to any property damage, whether or not related to the construction work (i.e. the Work), if the property insurance covering the non-Work property also insured the construction work. Continue reading →

This entry was posted in AIA Contracts, Construction Defects, Contracts, Mississippi, Subrogation, Waiver of Subrogation and tagged , , , , , .
Construction Defect

Not so Fast – Florida’s Legislature Overrules Gindel’s Pre-Suit Notice/Tolling Decision Related to the Construction Defect Statute of Repose


This entry was posted by on .

As discussed in a prior blog post, in Gindel v. Centex Homes, 2018 Fla.App. LEXIS 13019, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that when the plaintiffs provided a pre-suit notice in compliance with §558.004 of Florida’s construction defect Right-to-Cure statute, Fla. Stat. §§ 558.001 to 558.005, et. seq., they commenced a “civil action or proceeding,” i.e. an “action,” within the meaning of Florida’s construction defect Statute of Repose, Florida Statue § 95.11(3)(c). Thus, the court held that the plaintiffs commenced their action prior to the time Florida’s 10-year statute of repose period ended. In overturning the lower court’s dismissal of the action, the court found that because the Right-to-Cure statute, §558 of the Florida Statutes, sets out a series of mandatory steps that must be taken prior to bringing a judicial action, filing pre-suit notice of claim sufficiently constituted an “action” for purposes of Florida’s Statute of Repose. Continue reading →

This entry was posted in Construction Defects, Florida, Right to Repair Act, Statute of Limitations-Repose and tagged , , , .
Product Recall

Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls


This entry was posted by on .

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On April 2, 2019, the CPSC announced the following recalls related to products that present fire hazards:

  1. Southern Motion Recalls “Wireless Power” Reclining Furniture Due to Fire Hazard. According to the CPSC, “[t]he lithium-ion batteries used to power the “Wireless Power” reclining furniture can overheat, posing a fire hazard.”
  2. Stelpro Design Recalls Sonoma Wall Fan Heaters Due to Fire Hazard. According to the CPSC, “[a]n internal part of the heater fails to meet flammability performance requirements, posing a fire hazard.”
This entry was posted in CPSC Recalls, Products Liability and tagged .

COVID-19 and Subrogation: The Coronavirus’ Impact on Property Losses and Subrogation Claims


This entry was posted by on .

Will COVID-19 impact subrogation? Like so much else, the answer is “yes.”

The global effect of COVID-19 is unlike any event in human history. More than 4 billion people—over half of the world’s population—are currently under confinement measures. In just a few short weeks, COVID-19 has impacted nearly every aspect of life across the globe. In the United States, stay-at-home orders started in mid-March. We can only speculate how long this will be the new norm. On March 29th, President Trump suggested the spread of the coronavirus will not peak for at least another two weeks and he extended the national social distancing guidelines through April 30th.

Continue reading →

This entry was posted in Subrogation, Water Loss and tagged .